Why the Redskins should still have Johnathan Hankins on their radar

INDIANAPOLIS, IN - SEPTEMBER 17: Johnathan Hankins #95 of the Indianapolis Colts celebrates after a tackle against the Arizona Cardinals during the first half at Lucas Oil Stadium on September 17, 2017 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)
INDIANAPOLIS, IN - SEPTEMBER 17: Johnathan Hankins #95 of the Indianapolis Colts celebrates after a tackle against the Arizona Cardinals during the first half at Lucas Oil Stadium on September 17, 2017 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
5 of 5
Next
FOXBORO, MA – DECEMBER 06: Connor Barwin #98 of the Philadelphia Eagles sacks Tom Brady #12 of the New England Patriots during the first quarter at Gillette Stadium on December 6, 2015 in Foxboro, Massachusetts. (Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images)
FOXBORO, MA – DECEMBER 06: Connor Barwin #98 of the Philadelphia Eagles sacks Tom Brady #12 of the New England Patriots during the first quarter at Gillette Stadium on December 6, 2015 in Foxboro, Massachusetts. (Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images) /

Signing Hankins now is Nearly guilt free

As training camp approaches, Hankins has but few good employment options for the upcoming year, much less ones that would yield a contract on terms he was pursuing earlier this offseason. That’s because most teams have little cap space to accommodate those contract demands at this juncture of free agency. The only realistic deal Hankins would agree to now is a one-year, prove-it contract he could use as a stepping stone to a larger one in 2019.

Why shouldn’t the Redskins take advantage of this? Do they believe that adding Hankins would disrupt chemistry established in that unit or steepen the learning curve for their recent draft choices? Whatever the case may be, and for as much hope that the team holds out for its developing draft picks, there is an equal amount of, if not more, questions than answers surrounding those young players.

Hankins, to be sure, isn’t a transcendent talent that would dramatically upgrade the team’s defensive line. But he would bring stability to a group short on experience and veteran talent, and supply it with a productive known commodity they have not had for years. While it’s uncertain precisely why the club has ceased its pursuit of Hankins, there’s very little downside in considering signing him now.

And if the Redskins believe they’re satisfied with their defensive linemen now, they should always remember that you can’t have enough good ones.

Next: Redskins Training Camp Profile: WR Josh Doctson

That worked well for Philadelphia in 2017.  And it would certainly do the same for Washington, who can start by considering whether Hankins would be a fit now.