Redskins: 2019 NFL Draft top ten quarterback big board

AUSTIN, TX - NOVEMBER 03: Will Grier #7 of the West Virginia Mountaineers celebrates after the game against the Texas Longhorns at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium on November 3, 2018 in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Tim Warner/Getty Images)
AUSTIN, TX - NOVEMBER 03: Will Grier #7 of the West Virginia Mountaineers celebrates after the game against the Texas Longhorns at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium on November 3, 2018 in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Tim Warner/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
6 of 11
Next
DURHAM, NC – SEPTEMBER 29: Daniel Jones #17 of the Duke Blue Devils in action against the Miami Hurricanes during their game at Wallace Wade Stadium on September 29, 2017 in Durham, North Carolina. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)
DURHAM, NC – SEPTEMBER 29: Daniel Jones #17 of the Duke Blue Devils in action against the Miami Hurricanes during their game at Wallace Wade Stadium on September 29, 2017 in Durham, North Carolina. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images) /

This was a tough decision. Many analysts have Jones, at the very least, in their top four, and some are even higher on the former Duke Blue Devils standout. Jones will undoubtedly go in the first round; NFL teams are enamored with his size, his oft-referenced leadership qualities, his toughness, and the David Cutcliffe factor.

All of the aforementioned factors carry varying degrees of weight in the prospect evaluation equation, but how does Jones fare in other areas, more predictive toward professional success?

It’s obviously a subjective matter, and opinions will vary, but in my evaluation, Jones was not consistent in the areas most predictive for success at the next level. His field vision is subpar, and much of his offense at Duke was quick, rhythm-based passing, and not predicated on his talent. Anticipatory throws from Jones were seriously lacking, and when he was given the opportunity to go through progressions, he sometimes forced throws, raising questions about his decision making.

light. More. Five ways the Washington Redskins can stay bad

For some quarterbacks, forced throws can be their best throws. But Jones’ slightly-above-average, linear arm talent limits the versatility of his throwing arsenal, and while he can generate velocity, he generally needs to be undisturbed. Jones is better when his base is solid (On the run, his accuracy can be all over the place), and he has exceptional toughness in the pocket. But his upper body leaves something to be desired as a quarterback, and above the neck, he has some development to undergo as well. Jones handles pressure well with his feet, but not with his arm, or his mind.

Jones is a good athlete, and his toughness in the pocket will win over scouts, who ultimately grade the subjects of a very physical game. Jones is a competitor, and he has modest upside. But as it stands, he’s a prospect who looks the part, but might not actually be the part. His inability to consistently test the intermediate and deep ranges raises questions about his ability to elevate an offense in the NFL, as well as his willingness to take the correct risks when needed. Although his supporting cast gave him no favors at Duke, Jones’ scheme coddled him in some respects, and Jones’ performance on an individual level did not earn him the benefit of the doubt.