Washington Redskins: The moral hazard in retaining Su’a Cravens
By Desmond Lee
As much as Cravens’ rocky two years with the Washington Redskins may have bewildered fans of the team, it came as no surprise to those who knew him.
When coming into the League, sources described Cravens as “big time,” a term they used to describe the ego-without-borders the former Trojan had when evaluating his significance to prospective suitors. (I live 30 minutes from Craven’s hometown and spoke with two individuals from there that associate with persons close to Cravens.)
For instance, Cravens, according to them, refused to work out for teams he had little, if any, interest in playing for. In a yearly draft class where even the most elite draft prospects are thankful for the opportunity to ply their craft to any club that drafts them, Cravens self-aggrandizement would’ve been enough to knock him off most team’s draft boards.
Another set of Cravens’ “big time” episodes were self-imposed absences during his college career at USC. According to the sources, in one such instance, Cravens simply took off from the team to attend his high school’s homecoming.
More from Riggo's Rag
- What will Emmanuel Forbes bring to the Washington Commanders?
- Highlighting the best Commanders 2023 NFL Draft betting props
- 3 late Commanders rumors drawing buzz ahead of the 2023 NFL Draft
- 4 bold predictions for the Commanders 2023 NFL Draft
- Commanders News: Chase Young trade, draft day, CB riser and Sam Howell
Cravens apparently faced no consequences for this or any of his other short “sabbaticals” and was allowed to finish his career at USC as one of its standout linebackers.
This troubling lack of accountability Cravens brought with him from USC is equally as puzzling as the failure of Washington Redskins corporate intelligence, headed by then general manager Scot McCloughan, to spot it. If indeed this was accounted for, it then raises the baffling issue of why the team spent a second-round pick on Cravens in spite of it.
More significant is the looming concern of the moral hazard the team would create by allowing Cravens to return. Per Scott Allen of the Washington Post, Mason Foster recently remarked that he would welcome back Cravens to the team. But Foster was quick to note that the linebacker’s opinion was his alone. While empathy is in order for the travails that Cravens faced the past two years, lenity shouldn’t be extended for Cravens’ implementation of self-centered solutions, nor the complete exclusion of his team.