Grading the Redskins inside linebackers on the 2017 performance

ARLINGTON, TX - NOVEMBER 30: Zach Vigil #56 of the Washington Redskins forces Rod Smith #45 of the Dallas Cowboys out of bounds short of the goal in the fourth quarter of a football game at AT&T Stadium on November 30, 2017 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Wesley Hitt/Getty Images)
ARLINGTON, TX - NOVEMBER 30: Zach Vigil #56 of the Washington Redskins forces Rod Smith #45 of the Dallas Cowboys out of bounds short of the goal in the fourth quarter of a football game at AT&T Stadium on November 30, 2017 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Wesley Hitt/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 8
Next
LANDOVER, MD – DECEMBER 19: Tight end Greg Olsen #88 of the Carolina Panthers is tackled by defensive back Greg Toler #20 and outside linebacker Martrell Spaight #50 of the Washington Redskins in the fourth quarter at FedExField on December 19, 2016 in Landover, Maryland. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)
LANDOVER, MD – DECEMBER 19: Tight end Greg Olsen #88 of the Carolina Panthers is tackled by defensive back Greg Toler #20 and outside linebacker Martrell Spaight #50 of the Washington Redskins in the fourth quarter at FedExField on December 19, 2016 in Landover, Maryland. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images) /

Martrell Spaight

Martrell Spaight got an extended run with the Redskins for the first time in his three year career. The former fifth round pick notched six starts, but the results were largely a mixed bag, and it doesn’t look like he will amount to anything more than a backup player.

Spaight made 69 tackles during the 2017 season, and he looked like a solid tackler at times. When he was on the field next to Zach Brown, the duo fared well. Spaight benefited from Brown’s ability to swarm to the ball, and that allowed him to make a lot of tackles.

That said, when Spaight wasn’t on the field with other strong players, he couldn’t hold his own. Spaight showed a lack of instincts, particularly in coverage as he was unable to stay with tight ends, and his tackling ability wasn’t as strong either.

More from Commanders News

Spaight’s trouble in coverage will limit him to being merely a backup player at the best. While he did show improvement over his 2016 performance, it wasn’t nearly enough to allow the Redskins to think of him as a future starter. Given that the three linebackers ahead of him on the depth chart were set to hit the free agent market this offseason, it appears that Spaight really missed his opportunity to emerge as a big part of the Redskins future.

Right now, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see Spaight return next year, but I’m not certain he will be long for the team’s roster. His mediocre performance combined with his uncertain future will lead him to get a below average grade for this past season.

Spaight’s 2017 Grade: D-plus