Should the Washington Football Team re-sign Brandon Scherff?

Should Washington re-sign Brandon Scherff?

No 

Simply put: Brandon Scherff would most likely cost too much to keep. With Leno and Roullier already on the books, Washington’s undoubted want to sign Terry McLaurin to an extension this offseason, and the potential need to sign a veteran quarterback to an extension if they were to acquire one, Washington could go cheaper at Scherff’s spot.

Sure Brandon Scherff is a really, really good guard, but he has not been as dominant as he once was and he is over 30. There is a good chance the injuries will take a toll and he will soon not be close to the same player.

Not to mention that Wes Schweitzer is a perfectly capable replacement when he was called upon in Scherff’s absence. Saahdiq Charles has even shown flashes, especially as a run blocker, over the past few weeks. Not to mention that there will definitely be options available in the draft and free agency to either start or provide depth along with the interior.

Brandon Scherff has spent seven seasons in Washington, since being selected with the fifth overall pick in 2015. While it is disappointing that he never panned out at tackle like Washington originally hoped, he has been a great guard for the franchise which almost masks that mishap.

He also has been the team’s first All-Pro since Matt Turk, a punter, got the honor in 1996. He was instrumental in the development of Chase Roullier, as well as seasoning rookie Sam Cosmi in 2021.

But, unless he were to take a short-term deal or a hometown discount, it is most likely time for Washington and Scherff to part ways. If Brandon Scherff hits free agency, he will undoubtedly get a well-earned payday. Washington, on the other hand, could net a comp pick for Scherff, while still maintaining a solid line that has continuity.

There are of course caveats to this if Scherff’s contract demands change but Washington should let the former All-Pro and five-time Pro-Bowler hit free agency.