
The Seattle Seahawks were able to trade for defensive lineman Sheldon Richardson on Friday. The Washington Redskins should have done more to try to acquire the talented player.
On Friday afternoon, a rare, blockbuster trade happened in the NFL. The Seattle Seahawks and the New York Jets agreed to a trade that sent talented defensive lineman Sheldon Richardson to Seattle in exchange for receiver Jermaine Kearse and a second round pick. The deal will make the Seahawks’ strong defensive line even better, and the team has to be ecstatic about the move.
Early in the offseason, the Washington Redskins were one of the teams that was showing interest in Richardson. This is sensible, given the fact that their defensive line was a big weakness for the team last year. The unit has looked better this offseason, but having Richardson in the fold would make it even stronger.
However, the Redskins were reportedly unwilling to take on Richardson at his full salary in a deal. That hang up was the reason that they were unable to complete the trade. That said, the decision to ask for a pay cut could be a regrettable one for the Redskins for a couple of reasons.
Redskins Cuts: Team will miss Will Blackmon's leadership
The first is that the Redskins still are lacking depth on the defensive line. While the team did add some quality pieces in the offseason, they didn’t get a proven game changer. Of all the acquisitions, rookie Jonathan Allen is the closest to being a star. He has performed very well in the preseason and looks like a three down starter at the five technique.
That said, the two major free agent acquisitions on the line for the Redskins have not panned out as well. Stacy McGee is currently the starter at the right end position, but it appears that he will be an early downs player who will focus on stuffing the run. Meanwhile, Terrell McClain has predictably struggled in Washington’s 3-4 alignment, as he doesn’t have a true position in this defense. He could end up being a backup, which is a waste because of the contract they are paying him.
More from Riggo's Rag
- What will Emmanuel Forbes bring to the Washington Commanders?
- Highlighting the best Commanders 2023 NFL Draft betting props
- 3 late Commanders rumors drawing buzz ahead of the 2023 NFL Draft
- 4 bold predictions for the Commanders 2023 NFL Draft
- Commanders News: Chase Young trade, draft day, CB riser and Sam Howell
If Washington had Richardson on the line, the unit would look a lot different. Richardson would be a three down starter at one of the end positions, and it’s likely that Allen would have started opposite him. That would have been a fearsome duo for opposing offensive lines to deal with. Then, after the injury to Phil Taylor, McGee could have moved inside to start at nose tackle with Ziggy Hood being the primary backup at all positions. That would have been ideal for Jim Tomsula, but that will not happen now.
The other reason for regret is that the price to acquire Richardson was not altogether too much. Sure, second round picks are valuable, but the Seahawks just had to trade one and a decent starting receiver to get Richardson. Kearse is at best a No. 2 guy. The Redskins likely could have offered a second round pick and maybe another late round pick to interest the Jets.
Of course, they also would have had to clear some salary cap space to fit Richardson’s contract under the cap, but they could have managed that to bring in a top notch talent. In that situation, the candidates for pay cuts would have been Shawn Lauvao and DeAngelo Hall, who just took a second cut recently.

Richardson’s one year deal is notable, but it would fit in with the Redskins if Kirk Cousins were to leave.
Some may point to the fact that Richardson is a free agent at the end of this year, and that is why the Redskins didn’t want to bring him in. That would make sense, if and only if they are truly planning on re-signing Kirk Cousins and meeting his demands.
The Redskins and Cousins have been in negotiations for a new contract over the course of the past two offseasons. Twice, Cousins has signed the franchise tender. There is no knowing whether or not the two sides will agree to a long term deal in the 2018 offseason.
One thing is certain. Unless Cousins’ performance falls off a cliff, then the team will be facing stiff competition from desperate teams to sign Cousins. It’s not often a potential franchise quarterback hits the open market, and teams like the Cleveland Browns, Jacksonville Jaguars, and San Francisco 49ers will have immense interest in adding Cousins. Fueling the fire will be the loads of cap space that each team should have for the 2018 offseason.
More from Commanders News
- What will Emmanuel Forbes bring to the Washington Commanders?
- Highlighting the best Commanders 2023 NFL Draft betting props
- 3 late Commanders rumors drawing buzz ahead of the 2023 NFL Draft
- 4 bold predictions for the Commanders 2023 NFL Draft
- Commanders News: Chase Young trade, draft day, CB riser and Sam Howell
But, what does this have to do with Richardson? Simple. Richardson is on a one year contract, so if the team had re-signed Cousins, they likely wouldn’t be able to afford Richardson’s asking price. In that situation, then it definitely wouldn’t make sense to give up any sort of draft capital to get him, as the Redskins are unlikely to be a Super Bowl contender even with Richardson.
However, if the Redskins were fairly certain that Cousins would walk at too high of an asking price, then acquiring Richardson would have made sense. The team could have built up their stop unit that already features a talented young secondary with upside and a nice collection of pass rushers. Having a dominant three man line could have taken their defense to the next level, and the team could have re-signed Richardson in the offseason or franchised him to buy time.
Focusing on creating a strong defense if Cousins leaves would make sense. If the Redskins don’t quite have a quality quarterback, then building up the defense would be the best way to win games, as the Houston Texans have demonstrated in recent seasons.
Next: 3 Bubble players who should make Redskins team
At this point, this is all just hypothetical stuff. The Redskins have a more promising defensive line than they did at this time last year. But missing an opportunity to trade for one of the best five techs in the league could come back to bite them if their free agent acquisitions don’t pan out. It will be interesting to see if the Redskins try and target Richardson if he hits the open market in 2018.

