<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Closer Look At Tim Tebow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/28/a-closer-look-at-tim-tebow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/28/a-closer-look-at-tim-tebow/</link>
	<description>A Washington Redskins Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 01:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MorrisClide</title>
		<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/28/a-closer-look-at-tim-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-12542</link>
		<dc:creator>MorrisClide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riggosrag.com/?p=1588#comment-12542</guid>
		<description>It is suppose to be  that the defense was tremendous, but there is the intangible &quot;phenomenon Tebow&quot;. I guess that deserves discussion about what the Broncos record would have Kyle Orton continued to play. It looked like a losing team with Orton. The D is great, but Tebow say what someone should get some credit for the 7-1. QB is usually judged by victory and defeat plain and simple. The numbers may not be there but the most important. Now this could be the Trent Dilfer argument again, but these reimbursements fourth quarter just make the discussion more interesting.anyway, for more news, we can visit http://www.tebowformvp.com/... thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is suppose to be  that the defense was tremendous, but there is the intangible &#8220;phenomenon Tebow&#8221;. I guess that deserves discussion about what the Broncos record would have Kyle Orton continued to play. It looked like a losing team with Orton. The D is great, but Tebow say what someone should get some credit for the 7-1. QB is usually judged by victory and defeat plain and simple. The numbers may not be there but the most important. Now this could be the Trent Dilfer argument again, but these reimbursements fourth quarter just make the discussion more interesting.anyway, for more news, we can visit <a href="http://www.tebowformvp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tebowformvp.com/</a>&#8230; thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MorrisClide</title>
		<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/28/a-closer-look-at-tim-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-6740</link>
		<dc:creator>MorrisClide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riggosrag.com/?p=1588#comment-6740</guid>
		<description>It is suppose to be  that the defense was tremendous, but there is the intangible &quot;phenomenon Tebow&quot;. I guess that deserves discussion about what the Broncos record would have Kyle Orton continued to play. It looked like a losing team with Orton. The D is great, but Tebow say what someone should get some credit for the 7-1. QB is usually judged by victory and defeat plain and simple. The numbers may not be there but the most important. Now this could be the Trent Dilfer argument again, but these reimbursements fourth quarter just make the discussion more interesting.anyway, for more news, we can visit http://www.tebowformvp.com/... thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is suppose to be  that the defense was tremendous, but there is the intangible &#8220;phenomenon Tebow&#8221;. I guess that deserves discussion about what the Broncos record would have Kyle Orton continued to play. It looked like a losing team with Orton. The D is great, but Tebow say what someone should get some credit for the 7-1. QB is usually judged by victory and defeat plain and simple. The numbers may not be there but the most important. Now this could be the Trent Dilfer argument again, but these reimbursements fourth quarter just make the discussion more interesting.anyway, for more news, we can visit <a href="http://www.tebowformvp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tebowformvp.com/</a>&#8230; thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: does betfair loophole really work</title>
		<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/28/a-closer-look-at-tim-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-3365</link>
		<dc:creator>does betfair loophole really work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riggosrag.com/?p=1588#comment-3365</guid>
		<description>So happy to read such a interesting post that does not fall back on cheap rhetoric to get the idea covered.  Thanks for an entertaining read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So happy to read such a interesting post that does not fall back on cheap rhetoric to get the idea covered.  Thanks for an entertaining read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 16/23 queries in 0.091 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 319/333 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: riggosrag.com @ 2013-05-24 17:48:37 by W3 Total Cache -->