<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carriker Drawing Interest From The Redskins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/12/carriker-drawing-interest-from-the-redskins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/12/carriker-drawing-interest-from-the-redskins/</link>
	<description>A Washington Redskins Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sports Scatter</title>
		<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/12/carriker-drawing-interest-from-the-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports Scatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riggosrag.com/?p=1490#comment-2784</guid>
		<description>I think from about 1994 to 2008 the Redskins had the perfect set of personnel for the 3-4 and I always wondered why they kept banging their heads on brick walls trying to run 4-3. Now for the first time since Gibbs I, they really are built for the 4-3, and, they&#039;re going 3-4? Strange...to me Carter for Carriker would signify a 2-3 year rebuilding plan to fit the 3-4...Next year they&#039;d probably replace Fletcher, Blades, and McIntosh. Haynesworth would probably have to go in 2012, if not 2011.

I think they&#039;d be better off to leave the Defense in the 4-3 for the next two years while they put together some new pieces and draft players in 2011 and 2012 for a 2012 3-4 transition. They certainly need to spend all of their relevant 2010 picks on OL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think from about 1994 to 2008 the Redskins had the perfect set of personnel for the 3-4 and I always wondered why they kept banging their heads on brick walls trying to run 4-3. Now for the first time since Gibbs I, they really are built for the 4-3, and, they&#8217;re going 3-4? Strange&#8230;to me Carter for Carriker would signify a 2-3 year rebuilding plan to fit the 3-4&#8230;Next year they&#8217;d probably replace Fletcher, Blades, and McIntosh. Haynesworth would probably have to go in 2012, if not 2011.</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;d be better off to leave the Defense in the 4-3 for the next two years while they put together some new pieces and draft players in 2011 and 2012 for a 2012 3-4 transition. They certainly need to spend all of their relevant 2010 picks on OL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Harrison will taste Manflesh</title>
		<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/12/carriker-drawing-interest-from-the-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-2783</link>
		<dc:creator>James Harrison will taste Manflesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riggosrag.com/?p=1490#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>BTW, the &#039;one good player&#039; who fits at OLB is Brian Orakpo, not Carter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, the &#8216;one good player&#8217; who fits at OLB is Brian Orakpo, not Carter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Harrison will taste Manflesh</title>
		<link>http://riggosrag.com/2010/03/12/carriker-drawing-interest-from-the-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>James Harrison will taste Manflesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riggosrag.com/?p=1490#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That analysis is just unbelievable.

First, Carriker is not a linebacker.  He&#039;s about 300lb.  He&#039;d play end for the Redskins if they go to the 3-4 as expected.  Second, Carter isn&#039;t a &#039;physical&#039; DE, he&#039;s an undersized pass rusher.  Third, the Redskins actually need linebackers pretty badly.  They have basically one good player who&#039;s a fit at OLB in the 3-4. Carter is the right size for the job, he just sucks at it, hence Carter&#039;s and the team&#039;s unhappiness about the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That analysis is just unbelievable.</p>
<p>First, Carriker is not a linebacker.  He&#8217;s about 300lb.  He&#8217;d play end for the Redskins if they go to the 3-4 as expected.  Second, Carter isn&#8217;t a &#8216;physical&#8217; DE, he&#8217;s an undersized pass rusher.  Third, the Redskins actually need linebackers pretty badly.  They have basically one good player who&#8217;s a fit at OLB in the 3-4. Carter is the right size for the job, he just sucks at it, hence Carter&#8217;s and the team&#8217;s unhappiness about the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
